Healthcare and Life

by Randall Terry

It is Our Duty before God to End Child-killing.

God will give us the Grace.

We Can use the Healthcare Debate as one of the Steppingstones to Victory. 

I often fear that we fail to grasp the magnitude of our duty to end child-killing, and that we often doubt the inevitability of our victory against this holocaust.

It is certain that God Almighty hates the killing of the innocents. God gives the gift of life, and then commands: You Shall Not Murder. He hates the shedding of innocent blood. (See Proverbs 6:16-19 and Psalm 106:37-42)

Hence, we can declare with absolute certainty that God wants this holocaust end. That being said, we must ask ourselves the tough question: if God wants child killing by abortion to end, why have 50 million babies slaughtered, with no end in sight?

The problem is not with God -- obviously -- it is with us. We are His hands and feet. We are His missionaries. We are the body of Christ. We are the ones commanded to love our neighbor as ourselves, to rescue the innocent, to protect the fatherless, and to seek justice.

After 35 years of the killing fields, and 50 million dead, it is time to reassess what has been done, what has failed, and what we must do to secure complete and total victory: the abolition of legalized child killing from conception until birth.

As I have studied the social revolutions of the past, I have learned that the "irate, tireless minority" that drives the debate - and moves steadily from the fringes to the halls of power - seizes moments and creates crises that embody their struggle and highlight the injustice that they are fighting.

One need only study the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 60s to learn from one of the best guidebooks on social revolution written in 100 years. For example: Rosa Parks was one little black lady, whose "feets was tired," but with the wisdom and courage of a handful of civil rights leaders, they seized on the opportunity presented by their racist adversaries, and turned one small incident of injustice into an epic struggle that resulted in a glorious victory for liberty.

Yes -- Martin Luther King Jr. and other civil rights leaders received horrible press -- but they fought like warrior poets until they prevailed. Yes -- the confrontational tactics and incendiary actions and rhetoric of civil rights leaders and activists made many enemies -- but it was a required fare for victory.

I have been steadily dismayed at many pro-lifers around the country who fail to recognize the connection between seizing the moment and creating a crisis for justice, and the ultimate victory for the justice they seek.

Think back over the last few months: how much of the pro-life movement has fought courageously against the modification of the conscience clause for healthcare workers? How many traveled to Notre Dame to denounce President Obama's speech? How many fought deliberately against the nomination of Sotomayor to the Supreme Court?

Each of those battles in their own right was battles worth fighting, and battles worth losing. But beyond that, they provided golden opportunities to drive the injustice of child killing to center stage. Each of those battles could have been used by every pro-life group in America to decry the brutal murder of children; to call for the end of legalized child killing; to mobilize a public outcry in defense of the unborn. But for the most part, most groups and leaders said little, and did even less.

Let's fast-forward to the health care debate. Thankfully -- a few more leaders and groups are speaking out against child killing in health care -- but is it enough? The response to child killing in health care from many groups and individuals has been tepid, non-confrontational, "quiet and reasonable," and generally without effect.

Beyond that -- if it had not been for the efforts of a handful of pro-lifers in Washington DC and around the country who followed the confrontational and incendiary example of the civil rights movement and other social revolutions -- child-killing would not be a critical and dominant part of this debate. But because of these efforts, every major news outlet acknowledges that the fight to keep child killing out of this bill is at center stage. The Wall Street Journal called it the "new front".

I repeat: it is precisely because certain pro-life advocates refuse to passively and timidly "dialogue" about child killing that child killing is resuming a central location on the political horizon. It is because we are confrontational, irate, and righteously belligerent. Those who put politeness ahead of justice commit sin. Those who want to appear "reasonable" and "prudential" may be trapped in the sins of pride and the fear of man.

How can you "reason" with villains who want to crush the heads of little children? How is it a virtue to be "prudential" when the Nazi guard is about to drop a gas pill into a "shower" filled with Jews and Christians?

Do YOU Want to be the Sledgehammer!?

My question to every pro-lifer is simple: do YOU want to end child killing?

I'm sure you want child-killing to end; I'm sure that you want it to be over; but my question is this: do YOU want to be the sledgehammer in the hand of God that smashes this citadel of injustice? For example: most of us want the hungry to be fed in the subcontinent of Africa; likewise, most of us want somebody else to take them the food. "Yes, I want them fed. No, I do not want to board a plane and trek up mountains to feed them!"

While I grieve the lack of clarity and valor that has been displayed by many pro-lifers over the last six months, I'm equally certain that we can break the shackles of fear that bind us, and strip off the muzzle of timidity that silences us, and put on the armor of God. We can talk and act in accordance with reality: abortion is murder: the brutal, merciless slaughter of innocent human being. And we will fight against it with all our hearts until we crush it.

Let us fight to drive child killing from the health bill, doing so in such a way that gives us the momentum we need to drive child killing out of our nation and back to hell where it came from.

Come to DC sometime between September 9 and September 23.

If at all possible, please come to Washington DC anytime between September 9 until September 23.

Starting Wednesday, September 9, until Wednesday, September 23, we will be preaching and protesting, lobbying and leafleting on Capitol Hill. Every weekday we will preach to the Capitol Hill staff from 8:30-9:30 a.m. as they go to work at the entrances of the various Senate and House buildings. Then from 10 AM to 12 noon will be in front of the Cannon office building protesting, while others of our group go inside to meet with every single US Senator and every single U.S. House member - or at least meet with their staffs.

We are not professional lobbyists; we are not interested in their dinner parties; we are not interested in getting invited to some slick event. We want to end child killing. In the meantime, we want to obliterate child killing from the health-care bill, and then use this momentum towards our inevitable victory to crush legalized child killing underfoot.

I hope you will join us.

Go to www.OverturnRoe.com for the easy-to-view schedule.


Finally, we beg your prayers. These are intense days, and we face fearsome enemies. But with the help of God -- who made heaven and earth, and who gives life to these babies -- we will prevail in a mission to end child killing.

In Christ's Wounds kept.

Randall Terry

Published by permission of Randall Terry

Faithful Catholic Citizenship Based Upon the Gospel of Life

Note: This brochure is for Catholics who desire to vote in a manner that best reflects our Catholic Faith. The teaching of the Church herein quoted comes directly from our late Holy Father, John Paul II, as declared in Evangelium Vitae, (The Gospel of Life) unless otherwise noted. (All emphases added.)
1Can we vote for a candidate for “the common good” of society on various issues, if the candidate is pro-choice?
Answer: No. We cannot vote for a pro-choice candidate even if our motive is “the common good” of society on other issues. (The issue of “proportionate reasoning” is dealt with later.)

John Paul II states: “Laws which authorize and promote abortion and euthanasia are therefore radically opposed not only to the good of the individual but also to the common good; as such they are completely lacking in authentic juridical validity. Disregard for the right to life, precisely because it leads to the killing of the person whom society exists to serve, is what most directly conflicts with the possibility of achieving the common good. 72 It is impossible to further the common good without acknowledging and defending the right to life,…”101
2Does the Church teach that Abortion and Euthanasia are murder?
Answer: Yes. The Church teaches that abortion and euthanasia are murder.

John Paul II states concerning abortion: “The moral gravity of procured abortion is apparent in all its truth if we recognize that we are dealing with murder... 58 Athenagoras records that Christians consider as murderesses women who have recourse to abortifacient medicines, because children, even if they are still in their mother’s womb, ‘are already under the protection of Divine Providence’. Among the Latin authors, Tertullian affirms: “It is anticipated murder to prevent someone from being born; it makes little difference whether one kills a soul already born or puts it to death at birth…” 61
John Paul II states concerning euthanasia: “...euthanasia is a grave violation of the law of God, since it is the deliberate and morally unacceptable killing of a human person... Depending on the circumstances, this practice involves the malice proper to suicide or murder. Suicide is always as morally objectionable as murder.” 65, 66
3Are we required as Catholics to work to overturn Roe vs. Wade, and restore the protection of law to the unborn in the U.S.?


Answer: Yes. We are required as Catholics to work to overturn Roe vs. Wade, and restore the protection of law (i.e., make abortion illegal) in the U.S.

John Paul II declares: “The legal toleration of abortion or of euthanasia can in no way claim to be based on respect for the conscience of others…” 71 “The doctrine on the necessary conformity of civil law with the moral law is in continuity with the whole tradition of the Church.” 72 “Serving the Gospel of life thus means…to ensure that the laws and institutions of the State in no way violate the right to life, from conception to natural death, but rather protect and promote it.” 93 

John Paul II said to American Bishops: “An essential feature of support for the unalienable right to life, from conception to natural death, is the effort to provide legal protection for the unborn… Catholics, and especially Catholic legislators, must continue to make their voices heard in the formulation of cultural, economic, political, and legislative projects…in which the lives of all are defended and enhanced. …In defending life you are defending an original and vital part of the vision on which your country was built. America must become, again, a hospitable society, in which every unborn child and every handicapped or terminally ill person is cherished and enjoys the protection of the law.” (6, John Paul II to American bishops during an ad limina visit to Rome, October, 1998.)
4Can we invoke our conscience to prioritize other issues above abortion and euthanasia for “proportionate reasons” such as war, health care, immigration, the economy, etc.?

Answer: No. We cannot invoke our conscience to prioritize other issues above abortion and euthanasia for “proportionate reasons” such as war, health care, immigration, the economy, etc.

John Paul II states: “But God cannot leave the crime [of murder] unpunished: from the ground on which it has been spilt, the blood of the one murdered demands that God should render justice (cf. Gen 37:26; Is 26:21; Ez 24:7-8). From this text the Church has taken the name of the “sins which cry to God for justice”, and, first among them, she has included willful murder…for this reason whoever attacks human life, in some way attacks God himself.” 9 “Among all the crimes which can be committed against life, procured abortion has characteristics making it particularly serious and deplorable.

The Second Vatican Council defines abortion, together with infanticide, as an “unspeakable crime”. But today, in many people’s consciences, the perception of its gravity has become progressively obscured. The acceptance of abortion in the popular mind, in behaviour and even in law itself, is a telling sign of an extremely dangerous crisis of the moral sense, which is becoming more and more incapable of distinguishing between good and evil, even when the fundamental right to life is at stake. Given such a grave situation, we need now more than ever to have the courage to look the truth in the eye and to call things by their proper name, without yielding to convenient compromises or to the temptation of self-deception. 58

John Paul II, to American Bishops, states: “As Pastors, you must make every effort to ensure that there is no dulling of consciences regarding the seriousness of the crime of abortion, a crime which cannot be morally justified by any circumstance, purpose, or law.” (3, ad limina address, October 1998.)

We cannot invoke our conscience, and prioritize other issues above abortion and euthanasia for “proportionate reasons” such as war, health care, immigration, the economy, etc. This would be “self-deception.” These other issues can be extrinsic evils, but they are not greater than or even equal to the intrinsic evils of abortion and euthanasia. Our consciences are not ours to form as we think best; they must be formed by the Laws of God and the teachings of the Church, not personal political preference.

“Proportionate reasons” would not properly apply here, because one Presidential candidate is stridently pro-abortion, while other candidates are committed to overturn Roe vs. Wade and make child-killing illegal again. No authentic “proportionate reasons” could balance ending the murder of innocent children by abortion with arguments about just or unjust war, the care of the poor, the economy, etc. For “proportionate reasons” to exist, a litmus test must be passed: the object of one’s moral act (i.e., voting) must be intrinsically good or intrinsically neutral. Now, voting for a candidate who directly supports the right to murder (Roe v. Wade), while not voting for other existing candidates who want to curtail or end it, is not an intrinsically good or neutral act. Therefore, the object of one’s moral act (a person’s vote) in this case is an act that directly approves of child-killing, rather than curtailing or ending it. Proportionate reasons could exist if there were only two existing candidates, both of whom were pro-choice. In that case, a voter could morally choose one candidate who was less pro-choice over the other, to mitigate harm to innocent human life.
5Is voting for a pro-choice candidate in this election “cooperating formally with evil” and therefore a morally grave act? 

Answer: Yes. Voting for a pro-choice candidate in this election is “cooperating formally with evil,” and therefore a morally grave act.

John Paul II states: “… it is necessary to recall the general principles concerning cooperation in evil actions. Christians…are called upon under grave obligation of conscience not to cooperate formally in practices which, even if permitted by civil legislation, are contrary to God’s law. Indeed, from the moral standpoint, it is never licit to cooperate formally in evil. Such cooperation occurs when an action, either by its very nature or by the form it takes in a concrete situation, can be defined as a direct participation in an act against innocent human life or a sharing in the immoral intention of the person committing it. 74 

Voting for a pro-choice candidate in this election is “cooperating formally with evil,” and therefore a morally grave act, because the voter would have “direct participation in an act” (voting) that would result in laws and actions “against innocent human life.” Because no proportionate reasons are present, one is held directly responsible by God for all evil effects of such an act. Therefore it is a morally grave act to cooperate with a candidate who has stated his approval of the false “right” to murder the unborn or the victims of euthanasia.
6Can a Catholic vote in good conscience for a pro-choice candidate in this Presidential election?
Answer: No. A Catholic cannot vote in good conscience for a pro-choice candidate in this Presidential election.

John Paul II states: “In the case of an intrinsically unjust law, such as a law permitting abortion or euthanasia, it is therefore never licit to obey it, or to ‘take part in a propaganda campaign in favour of such a law, or vote for it’”. 73

With our federal government, we do not vote for laws; we vote for lawmakers who make laws in our stead. Given the histories and intentions of pro-abortion candidates to defend the legalized killing of the unborn, to vote for them is knowingly to participate in their evil acts and intentions; it increases the killing of children, and is therefore a vote for abortion itself.

7Certain Catholic clergy and laymen have made the moral and theological statement that “...it violates no aspect of Catholic teaching for a Catholic Voter to endorse, support, or vote for Barack Obama…”. (Doug Kmiec, Catholic Attorney and Author, Can a Catholic Support Him?)

Are they correct?

Answer: No. They are not correct. Endorsing, supporting, or voting for Obama in the 2008 Presidential election flagrantly violates Catholic teaching.

John Paul II states: “When a parliamentary or social majority decrees that it is legal, at least under certain conditions, to kill unborn human life, is it not really making a “tyrannical” decision with regard to the weakest and most defenceless of human beings? Everyone’s conscience rightly rejects those crimes against humanity of which our century has had such sad experience. But would these crimes cease to be crimes if, instead of being committed by unscrupulous tyrants, they were legitimated by popular consensus?” 70 

John Paul II instructed American Bishops on this very principle, saying: “As Bishops, you must continue to draw attention to the relationship of the moral law to constitutional and positive law in your society: “Laws which legitimize the direct killing of innocent human beings…are in complete opposition to the inviolable right to life proper to every individual; they thus deny the equality of everyone before the law…Dear Brother Bishops, Catholic moral teaching is an essential part of our heritage of faith; we must see to it that it is faithfully transmitted, and take appropriate measures to guard the faithful from the deceit of opinions which dissent from it…May your fidelity to the Lord and the responsibility for his Church which he has given you make you personally vigilant to ensure that only sound doctrine of faith and morals is presented as Catholic teaching.” (ad limina address, 6, 7) 


The late John Paul II – who spoke infallibly on morals as the Vicar of Christ and the Successor of St. Peter – declared abortion is “murder,” a “crime against humanity,” a “tyrannical” act that in some way “attacks God Himself;” abortion is an “unspeakable crime” in which the blood of the victims “cry to God for justice.” Moreover, “civil law” concerning abortion must conform to “the moral law” – “You shall not kill,” laws permitting abortion are “radically opposed to the common good,” we must work to assure that “every unborn child…enjoys the protection of law,” and it is “never licit” to “participate in a propaganda campaign in favor of it (abortion), or to vote for it.”

Obama shamelessly defends the false “right” to murder an innocent child by abortion during all nine months of pregnancy, for any reason. Obama defends partial birth abortion and the “unspeakable crime” of infanticide after a failed abortion. Obama is committed to keeping this crime against humanity “legal,” and he promised to sign The Freedom of Choice Act as soon as he is elected. Therefore to proclaim that it “violates no aspect of Catholic teaching for a Catholic Voter to endorse, support, or vote for Barack Obama…” (Doug Kmiec) is clearly absurd. 

In the light of The Gospel of Life which is the teaching of the Catholic Church—quoted faithfully in this document— and in the light of the history and intent of Obama, to suggest that “it violates no aspect of Catholic teaching for a Catholic Voter to endorse, support, or vote for Barack Obama” is clearly a misrepresentation of Catholic teaching. Therefore it is clearly erroneous, false teaching, and treachery against the The Gospel of Life. As John Paul II warned – it is an attempt to mislead “the faithful” with “the deceit of opinions which dissent” from the clear teaching of the Church

Who should you vote for? You have several valid options. You may choose to write in a candidate or to not vote in the presidential election. But you may not in good conscience, given this “concrete situation,” vote for Barack Obama if you want to be a “Faithful Catholic Citizen”.

Compiled and edited by Randall Terry,
Founder, Operation Rescue
September 29, 2008, Feast of St. Michael and St. Gabriel
“Oh Glorious Warrior, Oh Faithful Messenger, give us the grace to fight courageously and speak faithfully for the Innocent. Our Lady of Guadalupe, bring victory for the babies. Amen.”
Go to Humbleplea.com for more info

Abortion and Obama: My Broken Heart and Angry Heart

by RANDALL A. TERRY
FOUNDER, OPERATION RESCUE & THE SOCIETY FOR TRUTH AND JUSTICE

Dear Friend and Fellow Pro-lifer,

I confess: My heart is broken, and angry.

I ask you to read this, to pray, and to act.

I have literally wept over the compromise and outright treachery we are witnessing from certain evangelical and Catholic clergy, leaders, and so-called “thinkers” - Christians who claim to be pro-life but are supporting Obama for President.

I’m sure you are as shocked and dismayed as I am!

I can understand the reasoning of those who say they will not support John McCain; and I can feel the angst of those who say they are voting for McCain reluctantly; but I cannot understand those who claim to be pro-life, and followers of our Lord Jesus Christ supporting a man who has vowed to continue the slaughter of the innocent.

My heart is broken that pro-life Christians are prepared to sacrifice innocent children for the sake of some bizarre, unethical, and ungodly notion of "the common good."

But not only is my heart broken -- it is "filled with indignation." (See Jeremiah 15:17) I am indignant that people claiming to represent Jesus Christ are promoting Obama and thereby bearing false witness against Christ himself. Let me explain

When a Christian tries to create a “Christian” theological construct in which he justifies supporting a proponent of child-killing such as Obama for public office, he is implicitly declaring that Jesus is approving or even guiding this theological reasoning.

In other words -- they saddle our Savior with the murder of innocent children.

Let me warn you: in the coming pages I intend to demolish arguments and reasoning that falsely vindicate such a betrayal of innocent blood; I will prove -- with unimpeachable consistency and logic -- but the arguments which would seduce a Christian into voting for Obama are born in hell; “for even Satan masquerades as an Angel is light…” and false prophets and false messiahs arise to try and deceive God’ people. (See II Cor. 11:14.15; Matt. 24: 24)

You are a true pro-lifer, which is why you are receiving this letter. I’m sure that your heart must also be grieved at this treachery and deception. So please know -- I angry with you and our compatriots in this battle. I’m grieved with the betrayers of babies; those who claim to be our allies.

So let the treacherous beware: I will not speak with moderation; I will not equivocate; I will not spare the small or the great who in the name of Christ are helping the child-slayers of our time.

My Premise: Fighting Words for the Babies and for Truth

If someone votes for Obama, he will aid in the murder of innocent children.

If someone votes for Obama, he will have blood on his hands.

If someone votes for Obama, knowing Obama’s history and his intent – his 100% pro-death voting record and his promise to expand this holocaust in the future – that voter has betrayed innocent blood, and that voter is helping to attack Christ himself.

Helping Obama: Jesus said: "You did it to me..."

In Matthew 25:40, Jesus said: “Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brethren, you did it to me.”

The simple question is this: Who are “the least of Jesus’ brethren?” Are pre-born babies included as the “least” of Christ’s brothers? I will prove the answer is YES.

Jesus said: "Let the children come to me, and do not hinder them; for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven." (Matt 19:14) Mark repeats these words: "Let the children come to me, do not hinder them; for to such belongs the kingdom of God.” (Mark 10:14)

Please note: the Greek word for babe is “brephos,” which is the word used to identify John the Baptist, as he leapt for joy in his mothers womb in the presence of Mary and Jesus – just a few days after Christ’s conception! (See Luke 1:41, 44) This is the same word used to define Christ when the Angels told the shepherds that “…you will find a babe wrapped in swaddling cloths and lying in a manger." (Luke 2:12)

God uses the same word for a newborn child as an unborn child – showing that in His mind – they are both living children, precious and unique in His sight.

The Church has always held that an unborn child is a child, made in the image of God, and that to slay that unborn child is murder.

So, since “the kingdom of heaven belongs to little children;” and since the same Greek word is used to define a newborn baby and an unborn baby; and since the same word is used to describe John the Baptist as a “fetus” and Jesus as a newborn, we can surely say that Jesus includes unborn babies as the least of His brethren.

Hence, in some sacred way, what we do to the unborn, we do to Christ himself.
To attack or betray a child –whether in the womb or out – is to attack or betray Christ Himself.

Think of Herod. He sought to destroy the Christ Child, and slew the Innocent in the process.

To Christians who are planning to betray the children with their vote – we must ask them: “Would you vote for Herod after he slaughtered the Holy Innocents in Bethlehem? Would you vote for Herod while his hands dripped with their innocent blood? If not, how can you justify voting for Obama - a man cut from the same cloth as Herod?” Go ahead, ask them and jar them!

Killing the children of our day is in some way like attacking Christ himself. In fact, Catholics and Protestants alike will appreciate the fact that the great pro-life champion, John Paul II, wrote that “…whoever attacks human life, in some way attacks God himself.” (Evangelium Vitae, 9)

As I mentioned earlier, one reason I'm so indignant at this treachery is because those Christians who try to justify voting for Obama -- whether Catholic or Protestant -- couch their treachery in terms of Christian theology or Christian lingo. In other words – they imply or outright say that Jesus is guiding them to vote for someone who defends child-killing! Here are two examples…

Franky Schaeffer: Pro-life Champion Gone to “the Dark Side”

Remember the late Dr. Francis Schaeffer? He was a brilliant thinker and author. He wrote A Christian Manifesto (and many other books), and was one of the first evangelicals to raise a banner against child-killing. In many circles, he was and is a legend.

His son, Franky Schaeffer, was also a well known evangelical pro-life advocate in the early and mid 1980s. Franky was on Dr. Dobson’s Focus on the Family; he directed the magnificent film series, Whatever happened to the Human Race?, and he wrote the best seller, A Time for Anger, which sold hundreds of thousands of copies. (Both father and son had a profound impact on me in the early years of my pro-life calling and leadership.)

Now Franky Schaeffer is blasting and mocking Dr. James Dobson, and he has endorsed Obama for President! (See more at www.huffingtonpost.com). He wrote:

As a result of his [Dr. Dobson’s] power grabs and bullying of other evangelicals, not to mention his telling people how to vote and pointing them to the failed W [Bush], Dobson & Co. have zero credibility with a growing number of otherwise conservative evangelicals who happen-- this year--to be looking favorably at Senator Obama's holistic Christian-based world view. Unlike Dobson they like Obama's theology just fine.

I ask you: what does “Obama’s holistic Christian-based world view” and “Obama's theology” even mean? What Christian theology vindicates the murder of the innocent? None! It is not Christian theology; it is satanic theology, the theology of hell. Who but the Angel of Death would create a theology to justify attacking God’s most precious creation, human life, thereby assaulting God Himself?

“Roman Catholics for Obama:” Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing

I invite you to see the deception for yourself at their website. But for now, let me quote to you part of their pathetic attempt to justify their support for Obama. They say:

On this website, we have collected and linked to documents from the Church and from Church authorities that reflect on the importance of civic participation motivated by all of the principles of Catholic Social Teaching: Life and Dignity of the Human Person; Call to Family, Community, and Participation; Rights and Responsibilities; Option for the Poor and Vulnerable; The Dignity of Work and the Rights of Workers; Solidarity; and Care for God's Creation… After faithful thought and prayer, we have arrived at the conclusion that Senator Obama is the candidate whose views are most compatible with the Catholic outlook, and we will vote for him because of that…”(See their theological gibberish at www.romancatholicsforobama.com)

These poor people have lost their way, as well as their minds, and maybe their souls. They are misrepresenting and betraying Church teaching. Evangelium Vitae and Humane Vitae and Christ the King are the teaching of the Church - not this garbage.

It is the height of hypocrisy to talk about the “Life and Dignity of the Human Person” while supporting a man who helps destroys human life and robs a human bay of his God-given dignity; they talk of a “Call to Family,” yet support a man who helps would murder children that should be loved and protected in a family; they talk about “Community and Participation” - what “community” can claim loyalty to Christ while it “participates” in the murder of children?

They talk about “Rights and Responsibilities;” what about the Right to Life of the child and the Responsibility of Catholics to protect children? They talk about the "Poor and Vulnerable;” since when is it the teaching of the Catholic Church to kill the poor and the vulnerable? And do they show their love for the “Dignity and Rights of Workers” by killing future workers and denying their right to life? Do they “Care for God's Creation” by killing His masterpiece -- innocent human beings?! They have “Solidarity” with all right – solidarity with hell.

The Church teaches that there is an ethical hierarchy; all issues are not equal We can disagree on the war, or on how to care for the poor, or on health care, or on other issues of "the common good," but we cannot disagree on child killing. Abortion is murder; it is our first duty, and our highest priority, to end this holocaust. To claim that we can betray innocent children to their deaths for "the common good" is as evil as it is false. Read the Masterpiece, The Gospel of Life by John Paul II, and you’ll see, Roman Catholics for Obama LIE THROUGH THEIR TEETH!

I wish I could tell you that these two examples are an oddity. They are not. Literally millions of Evangelicals and Catholics are poised to betray innocent children – and Christ Himself – by voting for Obama for President.

Concerning black American evangelicals and preachers who are lining up behind Obama, this is not about faithfulness to Biblical Authority; nor is it about loving “the least of these.” It appears that much of their support is about the color of Obama’s skin. If so, it is racist, not Christian.

Blow the Trumpet! We Must Declare the Truth LOUDLY

Remember: Truth has within it the seeds of its own victory. Our duty is to proclaim the Truth – without fear, without compromise, without wavering; to be “a solid wall of brass.” (Jer: 15:20)

We must “Blow the trumpet in Zion, sound the alarm on [God’s] Holy Mountain.” (See Joel 2:1) Trumpets and alarms are noisy. We need to make a lot of holy noise. We must wake our brethren from their stupor, and warn them of the danger. The facts are simple: you have family members and fellow church members who are being deceived, and are planning to vote for Obama – the most pro-death candidate in history. Will you sound an alarm for them?
We must rattle them, shake them, and wake them with all the love and passion we can – for their own sakes – and for the sake of the innocent children.

It is our duty to convince as many of our brethren at the Churches we attend that they cannot ethically vote for Obama. To do so is treachery against the Laws of God, and the lives of babies.

We have Created Brochures and Ads – for You to Use
(Download them for free at www.humbleplea.com)

For those with the passion to defend innocent life and Christian orthodoxy, we have created “weapons of rhetorical war” for you to use to wake up your brethren.

The Brochure: We just printed 250,000 copies of Is it Immoral to vote for Obama for President? We will send you as many copies as you will hand out in your community at churches, etc.

The Newspaper Ads: Wanted: Christians who will Defend the Innocent with Their Vote are available at no charge in 6 different versions for Evangelical and Catholic readers.

Scheduled Events: Will you blow the Trumpet in Your City?

Denver – August 25-28. I know it is late, but if your heart is stirred to join us in Denver to protest against Obama during the Democratic Convention, please contact us right away. Call me at 904-687-9804, or go online for details at www.humbleplea.com.

September 29 – St. Michael the Archangel Protests and “Sit-Ins.” On this day – the day the Church honors Michael, the great Archangel of Battle, we will co-ordinate peaceful sit-ins and pickets outside Obama headquarters around the nation. We will hold signs: “No Christian may in good conscience vote for Obama for President” and similar signs.

October 3 – Respect Life Sunday. On this Sunday (and Saturday night) we (you and us!) will put brochures on thousands of windshields of cars while people attend church around the nation.

October 10, 17, and 24 – Literature drops nationwide. Again, we will distribute flyers outside during church urging Obama voters to come to their senses and repent of their intention.

November 2 – aborted baby signs at Churches. On the last Sunday before the election, at select churches, we will hold up pictures of aborted children along the road near the church exit (WHICH IS COMPLETELY LEGAL) with the words: A Vote for Obama is a Vote for Dead Children. This is our last chance to jolt the faithful back to faithfulness before the election.

We will teach you what to do – step by step. This is all a prophetic witness for God, His Laws, and His Children – the innocent babies Obama has sworn to help slaughter. This is not for the faint hearted, but – with God’s help – you can do it.

I beg you in Jesus Holy Name for your prayers.

Paul said: “Who is equal to this?” (II Cor.2:16) In our own strength, none of us can keep this pace, nor take on this battle. But we “can do all things through Christ who strengthens” us (see Phil. 4:13). Even then – it will be hard. (It is not a sacrifice until it hurts.) We are on a 7 week trip – recruiting, mobilizing, training people to lift up their voices. We beg your prayers for the grace of God and the help of angles to give us strength, courage, protection and peace.